by JD10 » Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:46 am
First off, the DC teachers were not there with their hands out asking for raises 1 month after the levy passed. The teachers there, like all other teachers, are members of a union and their contract was set for renewal by the end of the year, like all other teachers. This happens every 2 years as that is the length of their contracts. This negotiation would have happened wether the levy was passed or not. In the private sector there are many union jobs that the members are given automatic raises as set by their contract and are not based on merit. Why are teachers singled out as the only union that is scrutinized by the public for what they get paid? Many of the other government jobs are also unionized or set on a pay scale and are paid the same way not based on merit. Why are they not scrutinized the same? As for the levy, people need to vote as they can afford. The saying goes, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. If an extra $100 put into education today will keep someone out of jail tomorrow because he/she is a productive citizen in society, can't we afford to do that instead of paying thousands for them to sit in jail? Studies have shown that educated people make more money, are more productive citizens and are less likely to break the law.